RE: Kelly corporation

Lindsay Oades ( (no email) )
15 May 1996 15:50:40 +1000

Lois,
Peter and I thank you for the question "when is a construct NOT a corporate
construct?" We have found this a very useful question to elaborate our ideas.
The answer in part revolves around the concept of private language. We are
formulating a more comprehensive response.

Peter Caputi & Lindsay Oades
Wollongong
_______________________________________________________________________________
To: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
Cc: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
From: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk on Tue, May 14, 1996 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: Kelly corporation
RFC Header:Received: by uow.edu.au with SMTP;14 May 1996 18:50:38 +1000
Received: from norn.mailbase.ac.uk (daemon@norn.mailbase.ac.uk
[128.240.226.1]) by wyrm.its.uow.edu.au (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA26187;
Tue, 14 May 1996 18:45:20 +1000 (EST)
Received: by norn.mailbase.ac.uk id <IAA14591@norn.mailbase.ac.uk>
(8.6.12/ for mailbase.ac.uk); Tue, 14 May 1996 08:59:50 +0100
Received: from mail.crl.com by norn.mailbase.ac.uk id
<IAA14574@norn.mailbase.ac.uk>
(8.6.12/ for mailbase.ac.uk) with SMTP; Tue, 14 May 1996 08:59:42 +0100
Received: from crl13.crl.com by mail.crl.com with SMTP id AA24892
(5.65c/IDA-1.5 for <pcp@mailbase.ac.uk>); Tue, 14 May 1996 00:55:01 -0700
Received: by crl13.crl.com id AA26715
(5.65c/IDA-1.5 for pcp@mailbase.ac.uk); Tue, 14 May 1996 00:50:09 -0700
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 00:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lois Shawver <rathbone@crl.com>
To: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
Cc: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Kelly corporation
In-Reply-To: <4871BF942A9@psyc-1.uow.edu.au>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960514004949.26699A-100000@crl13.crl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-List: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave pcp'
to mailbase@mailbase.ac.uk
Reply-To: pcp@mailbase.ac.uk
Sender: pcp-request@mailbase.ac.uk
Precedence: list

Peter-

When is a construct NOT a corporate construct?

..Lois Shawver

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%