I think that whether we use the term "corporation" or "tribe" is slightly
irrelevant within the overarching construct of a "group construct system". The
idea provides a useful framework for understanding how groups(organisations,
tribe, culturesetc.) are composed as well as the rules (explicit and implicit)
by which the group operates. This also helps(in my mind) to understand the
synergy concept, whereby the group acting together form a stronger entity than
the individuals when operating fom within a shared construction. Also peer
pressure can be explained in terms of group norms and requirement to conorm to
the expectations of the common construct system.
I would like to suggest that we have recently witness a form of corporate
construct regarding behaviour and acceptability of "deviant" behaviour where it
was deemed that the shared aims and goals were being abused.
John F
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%