Thanks for your posting re:bibliography.
Reading over yours triggered a renewal of the question, for me: what
is it that a construct is?
My constructivism grounding has me believing that, while anything can be
said, that which is said can only be
-real (groundable/provable)
-not real (illusion)
-linguistic (existing only in language: complaint)
I deduce, then, that, by 'construct,' Dr Kelly was referring to a
linguistic distinction...or...was he? Perhaps you, or one of our
colleages who is more knowledgeable than I am, would be willing to
comment on this.....
Thanks again. Best, Gary
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%