I have read carefully both of your recent messages. Thanks for them. I
note that you both join in a recommendation that I
"identify a particular case, and offer your "languaging"
interpretation. You may find others agreeing with you on the case level,
which might put them in a similar "constructivist" paradigm, even when
they don't follow Flores all the way up the hill he climbs.
I would be happy to do this, but I would prefer it if one or both of you
would suggest a 'case' for me to comment upon, from the constructivist
perspective I have learned about.
Would that be okay with either/both of you?
-- Best, Gary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 'WE LIVE IN LANGUAGE' "We come to others and they come to us, in language. "Without language,we have no relationships. "In language we are faithful and we betray; contract marriage, and file divorce. "In language we raise children, and bury our dead. "In language we sing, dance, and make love. "In language, we forgive, celebrate and commit. "We live in language." -Fernando Flores,PhD,author,Ontological Design Course; and (w/ T.Winograd,PhD),"Understanding Computers & Cognition." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%