> If I have a "personal
>construct" is it supposed to be a construct that had no roots in a
>linguistic community? In what sense is it "personal"? Are personal
>constructs based on neologism?
This question interests me, but I think I missed some of the earlier
discussion of "social constructionism" and language. I'd be interested in a
reference to sources on these topics. Thanks
Bob
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%