Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10)

The SOS-10 is a brief self-report scale of 10 items that measures psychological health and well-being. The original publication rather nicely describes it:

Our results suggest that the scale appears to mea-
sure a broad domain of psychological health

Absract, p. 359 in Blais, M. A., Lenderking, W. R., Baer, L., deLorrell, A., Peets, K., Leahy, L., & Burns, C. (1999). Development and initial validation of a brief mental health outcome measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7303_5. [Not OA]

The time span is the last seven days and items are scored between 0 and 6 where 0 is anchored by “Never” and 6 by “All of the time or nearly all of the time”. All items are positively cued and simple scoring is from 0 to 60. It can be used for assessment or for change measurement.

Details #

There are at least three translations of the measure. The original paper gave logit difficulty scores for each item illustrating that they covered a substantial range of “difficulty”. I believe the measure remains free to use for unfunded research and clinical services on application to the MAPI/ePROVIDE repository.

The original . I have used it in a number of CORE studies as a convergent validity check measure, these include:

  • Paz, C., Evans, C., Valdiviezo-Oña, J., & Osejo-Taco, G. (2020). Acceptability and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Translation of the Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10-E) Outside the United States: A Replication and Extension in a Latin American Context. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1825963. [Open access]
  • Paz, C., Hermosa-Bosano, C., & Evans, C. (2021). What Happens When Individuals Answer Questionnaires in Two Different Languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 688397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688397. [Open access]
  • Zhang, Y., Hu, J., Evans, C., Jin, L. W., Wu, M. Y., Wang, C. Y., Zhang, X. J., Lu, W. H., & Chen, G. P. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation-outcome measure (CORE-OM). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 2, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1682120. [Not OA, contact me and ask for a copy (do cite the paper so I know what you want!)]

Try also #

CORE system
ePROVIDE
Information in the MAPI research Trust ePROVIDE database
MAPI Research Trust

Chapters #

Not mentioned in the OMbook.

Online resources #

None yet.

Dates #

First created 4.iv.24.

Powered by BetterDocs